Comparison of two “Medicare for all” health care plans
The
plans are Health Security America (HSA), and HR 676, cited as
the United States National Health Insurance Act (or the Expanded
and Improved Medicare for All Act). Health Security America
health plan was designed primarily by Dr. Fred Bannister and very specifically
described in his book Health Security America:
Fixing the health care crisis. The United States National
Health Insurance Act was led by Rep. John Conyers, D-MI. Both plans
fall under the umbrella of “Medicare for All.”
Both of the “Medicare
for All” plans are revolutionary and merit examination. The list
below has some of the main points that need to be compared and contrasted,
with the aim of ensuring that every American finally gets a fair health
plan, unadulterated by the concerns of special interests such as drugs
and device manufacturers, hospital and professional associations.
Issues:
(1) Which health
plan gives the individual citizen a voice in a decision making process
as free of unseen lobbyist influence as possible? Will information on
major issues be as available to the individual citizen as it is to the
special interests?
(2) Which health
plan offers the more accessible, transparent, and above all simple administration?
(3) Which health
plan will allow the citizen to make the final decisions on the cost (premiums)
and coverage since he or she will pay this bill every month for HSA or
yearly in taxes for HR 676?
(4) Which health
plan will permit clear accountability (as opposed to vague, resistant
bureaucracy)?
(5) Which health
plan makes the citizen more cognizant of his or her personal and family
health responsibility?
Abstract in chart
form comparing two “Medicare for All” health care plans
Health Security
America is compared to H.R.676 cited as the United States National
Health Insurance Act (or the Expanded and Improved Medicare for
All Act)
| Issues
Compared |
Health
Security America (HSA) |
HR
676 |
| Which
health plan allows the individual citizen to have a voice in the decision
making process as free of unseen lobbyist influence as possible? Will
information on major issues be as available to the individual citizen
as it is to the special interests? |
++++ |
+ |
| Which
health plan offers the more open administration, transparent administration
and above all simple administration? |
++++ |
+ |
| Which
health plan will allow the citizen to make the final decisions on
the cost (premiums) and coverage since he or she will pay this bill
every month? |
++++ |
++ |
| Which
health plan will allow the citizen an easy determination of accountability
not hidden is some vague bureaucracy as he will be responsible for
the cost and coverage? |
++++ |
+ |
| Which
health plan makes the citizen more cognizant of his personal and family
health responsibility i.e. the health plan that he pays for with a
payroll tax or one in which the monthly bill payer is continually
reminded there is a significant cost to good health coverage and personal
health decisions can reduce this cost? |
++++ |
+ |
For convenience
the sections in these comparisons will match the sections in H.R. 676.
The book Health Security America: Fixing the health
care crisis is available from the plan’s website:
www.healthsecurityamerica.com. The author can be contacted at fredb@healthsecurityamerica.com
. Rep. Conyers’ website: http://www.house.gov/conyers/
Sec. 101. Eligibility
and Registration
HR 676:
(a) In general—
all individuals residing in the United States (including any territory
of the United States) are covered under the USNHI Program entitling them
to a universal, best quality standard of care. Each such individual shall
receive a card with a unique number in the mail. An individual's social
security number shall not be used for purposes of registration under this
section.
(b) Registration— Individuals and families shall receive a United
States National Health Insurance Card in the mail, after filling out a
United States National Health Insurance application form at a health care
provider. Such application form shall be no more than 2 pages long.
(c) Presumption— Individuals who present themselves for covered
services from a participating provider shall be presumed to be eligible
for benefits under this Act, but shall complete an application for benefits
in order to receive a United States National Health Insurance Card and
have payment made for such benefits.
HSA:
(a) HSA is clear
that all citizens are entitled to coverage. The individual citizen would
apply for the insurance and could not be refused for any reason. If the
citizen is disabled or unable to enroll, Medicaid—Social Services
in each county or city would enroll him or her. If the citizen is indigent,
the government will supply funding and Congress will determine at what
level of income an individual has to be below before he or she would be
eligible for this help. Below the age of 19 years all are automatically
covered with no questions. Every person who has reached majority has a
responsibility to apply and take an interest in his or her well being.
A person may reject
the plan and carry no insurance. He or she will be billed by providers
and be expected to pay based on HSA fees. The author of the plan makes
the assumption that no concerned human wants to take the risk of no insurance
if there is anyway he can afford it. Those that do take this risk might
well be above the eligibility level for getting government help and if
so they will be subject to dunning and be expected to pay with money or
assets. These same people would be subject to a 6 month wait after joining
the plan after the initial sign-up should they become ill and want the
insurance.
Sec.102. Benefits
and Portability
HR 676:
(a) In General—
The health insurance benefits under this Act cover all medically necessary
services, including—
(1) primary care
and prevention;
(2) inpatient care;
(3) outpatient care;
(4) emergency care;
(5) prescription drugs;
(6) durable medical equipment;
(7) long term care;
(8) mental health services;
(9) the full scope of dental services (other than cosmetic dentistry);
(10) substance abuse treatment services;
(11) chiropractic services; and
(12) basic vision care and vision correction (other than laser vision
correction for cosmetic purposes).
(b) Portability—
Such benefits are available through any licensed health care clinician
anywhere in the United States that is legally qualified to provide the
benefits.
(c) No Cost-sharing— No deductibles, co-payments, coinsurance, or
other cost-sharing shall be imposed with respect to covered benefits.
HSA:
(a) Benefits 1-6
are covered immediately after the plan begins functioning.
Benefits 7-12 are
all-encompassing and much of the extent of cost unknown and much is open
ended. Every one of these benefits might be included if citizens after
the hearing processes and voting takes place decide they can afford them
and want them. Citizens in the HSA plan determine coverage and premiums
with the added rule that they may not accrue long-term debt.
(b) There is no
difference in portability and it is appropriate.
(c) HR-676 offers
everything free but does not consider cost in relationship to coverage.
Citizens may well decide this is appropriate but it will need to be changed
from the current Medicare rules if this is going to happen and the present
form of Medicare is predicted to go into default in 2020. Deductibles
have pros and cons to them and citizens will have to decide.
Sec.103.
Qualification of Participating Providers
HR 676:
(a) Requirement
to Be Public or Non-profit-
(1) IN GENERAL-
No institution may be a participating provider unless it is a public
or not-for-profit institution.
(2) CONVERSION OF INVESTOR-OWNED PROVIDERS- Investor-owned providers
of care opting to participate shall be required to convert to not-for-profit
status.
(3) COMPENSATION FOR CONVERSION- The owners of such investor-owned providers
shall be compensated for the actual appraised value of converted facilities
used in the delivery of care.
(4) FUNDING- There are authorized to be appropriated from the Treasury
such sums as are necessary to compensate investor-owned providers as
provided for under paragraph (3).
(5) REQUIREMENTS- The conversion to a not-for-profit health care system
shall take place over a 15-year period, through the sale of US Treasury
Bonds. Payment for conversions under paragraph (3) shall not be made
for loss of business profits, but may be made only for costs associated
with the conversion of real property and equipment.
(b) Quality Standards-
(1) IN GENERAL-
Health care delivery facilities must meet regional and State quality
and licensing guidelines as a condition of participation under such
program, including guidelines regarding safe staffing and quality of
care.
(2) LICENSURE REQUIREMENTS- Participating clinicians must be licensed
in their State of practice and meet the quality standards for their
area of care. No clinician whose license is under suspension or who
is under disciplinary action in any State may be a participating provider.
(c) Participation
of Health Maintenance Organizations-
(1) IN GENERAL-
Non-profit health maintenance organizations that actually deliver care
in their own facilities and employ clinicians on a salaried basis may
participate in the program and receive global budgets or capitation
payments as specified in section 202.
(2) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS- Other health
maintenance organizations, including those which principally contract
to pay for services delivered by non-employees, shall be classified
as insurance plans. Such organizations shall not be participating providers,
and are subject to the regulations promulgated by reason of section
104(a) (relating to prohibition against duplicating coverage).
(d) Freedom of Choice-
Patients shall have free choice of participating physicians and other
clinicians, hospitals, and inpatient care facilities.
HSA:
(a) Requirement
to be public or non-profit: The entire (a) section on profit-taking status
of HR-676 is really not necessary in HSA, which accomplishes the necessary
health reform in a simpler and less expensive manner. Hospitals will be
governed and overseen by regional planning agencies. The operating people
in the hospitals will stay in the same positions and of course it will
be non-profit but the people who own the assets will be paid rent on their
investment determined by appraisals. They will not be paid rent or dividends
based on the profit and loss statement as currently done. This will save
the US Treasury much money.
HSA’s mechanism
of operating by providers will make them independent of institutions such
as large clinics, HMO’s or other managed care plans by virtue of
the payment schedules. The clinics and whoever currently owns them will
be paid rent by providers determined by the marketplace. Again, this will
not require outlays from the Treasury and assumption of ownership. This
all will stay in our current marketplace with no influence on health care
other preventing further outlays from our government.
(b) Quality standards:
Quality standards as in HR-676 are fine with the addition of the peer
review of local medical societies and other professional societies that
do peer review. This will add another level to quality.
(c) Participation
of health maintenance organizations: These organizations can continue
to exist but they will function by the same rules and fees as any independent
physician or other provider. There will be no capitation payments or other
negotiations to reach them. It will be unlikely HMO’s will continue
to exist once their providers are freed to run their own practice or business.
There will not be enough money to pay for the administration and providers
at the same time. If they continue to exist they will be functioning under
much lower salary structures than now.
(d) Freedom of choice:
As in HR-676, patients shall have free choice of participating physicians
and other clinicians, hospitals, and inpatient care facilities.
Sec.104.
Prohibition Against Duplicating Coverage
HR 676:
(a) In General—
It is unlawful for a private health insurer to sell health insurance coverage
that duplicates the benefits provided under this Act.
(b) Construction— Nothing in this Act shall be construed as prohibiting
the sale of health insurance coverage for any additional benefits not
covered by this Act, such as for cosmetic surgery or other services and
items that are not medically necessary.
HSA:
(a) The mechanisms
of HSA would make selling duplicate benefits virtually impossible but
HSA has no quarrel with this statement.
(b) Construction:
Full agreement with HR-676
Finances
Subtitle A—Budgeting and payment
Sec.201.
Budgeting Process
HR 676:
(a) Establishment
of Operating Budget and Capital Expenditures Budget-
(1) IN GENERAL—
To carry out this Act there are established on an annual basis consistent
with this title—
(A) an operating
budget;
(B) a capital expenditures budget;
(C) reimbursement levels for providers consistent with subtitle B;
and
(D) a health professional education budget, including amounts for
the continued funding of resident physician training programs.
(2) REGIONAL ALLOCATION—
After Congress appropriates amounts for the annual budget for the USNHI
Program, the Director shall provide the regional offices with an annual
funding allotment to cover the costs of each region's expenditures.
Such allotment shall cover global budgets, reimbursements to clinicians,
and capital expenditures. Regional offices may receive additional funds
from the national program at the discretion of the Director.
(b) Operating Budget—
The operating budget shall be used for—
(1) payment for
services rendered by physicians and other clinicians;
(2) global budgets for institutional providers;
(3) capitation payments for capitated groups; and
(4) administration of the Program.
(c) Capital Expenditures
Budget— The capital expenditures budget shall be used for funds
needed for—
(1) the construction
or renovation of health facilities; and
(2) for major equipment purchases.
(d) Prohibition
Against Co-Mingling Operations and Capital Improvement Funds— It
is prohibited to use funds under this Act that are earmarked—
(1) for operations
for capital expenditures; or
(2) for capital expenditures for operations.
HSA:
(a)
(1) No disagreement
on an operating budget
(2) Once the board has all the necessary citizen information to set
premiums and coverage the budget will be set for the non-profit citizen-owned
HSA insurance corporation. Providers will bill HSA based on the fee
schedule given them and will operate their part of the health system
independently. They will be paid within 14 days after computer submission.
(This will be the only method of submitting bills)
(b). The operating
budget shall be used for—
(1) This: payment
for services rendered by physicians and other clinicians
(2) But not this: institutional providers will bill just as others do.(They
have patient base as do non-institutional providers)
(3) Or this: there will be no capitated groups.
(4) This: administration of the program
(c)
(1) Hospitals
will bill as do others (based on a fee schedule) and they will allocate
funds for themselves but per the regional health planning rules set
down for them
(2) Equipment purchases of size will be governed again by the regional
health planning agency.
(d)
(1) Hospitals
will administer the spending of money received from the insurance payments
but still under the broad guidance of the regional planning agency.
(2) Same as above number (1)
In summary of the budget process: HSA is in agreement with some of this
section’s paragraph subjects but is more specific and will reach
goals by a totally different method.
The decisions of
this section will be made by citizens not by congress and given to directors.
HR-676 would be classified as decisions coming from the top down.
In summary, citizens
will make all major decisions, since they will be paying the bill and
receiving the coverage. This will be a pay as you go system with no long-term
debt allowed. The Board of Information will provide the citizens with
information and knowledge to make these decisions via the citizen governance
mechanisms in HSA The citizen has a responsibility to listen, watch and
participate in the governance. This will be the best way to limit special
interest influence such as drug companies, professional groups and hospital
associations. It is assumed not all 295 million people will participate
in the HSA governance process but what number would? It is not unreasonable
to think that 10,000 people would pay attention to such a serious matter.
Sec.202.
Payment of Providers and Health Care Clinicians
HR 676:
(a) Establishing
Global Budgets; Monthly Lump Sum—
(1) IN GENERAL—
The USNHI Program, through its regional offices, shall pay each hospital,
nursing home, community or migrant health center, home care agencies,
or other institutional provider or pre-paid group practice a monthly
lump sum to cover all operating expenses under a global budget.
(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF GLOBAL BUDGETS— The global budget of a provider
shall be set through negotiations between providers and regional directors,
but are subject to the approval of the Director. The budget shall be
negotiated annually, based on past expenditures, projected changes in
levels of services, wages and input, costs, and proposed new and innovative
programs.
(b) Three Payment
Options for Physicians and Certain Other Health Professionals—
(1) IN GENERAL—
The Program shall pay physicians, dentists, doctors of osteopathy, psychologists,
chiropractors, doctors of optometry, nurse practitioners, nurse midwives,
physicians' assistants, and other advanced practice clinicians as licensed
and regulated by the States by the following payment methods:
(A) Fee for
service payment under paragraph (2).
(B) Salaried positions in institutions receiving global budgets under
paragraph (3).
(C) Salaried positions within group practices or non-profit health
maintenance organizations receiving capitation payments under paragraph
(4).
(2)
FEE FOR SERVICE—
(A)
IN GENERAL— The Program shall negotiate a simplified fee schedule
that is fair with representatives of physicians and other clinicians,
after close consultation with the National Board of Universal Quality
and Access and regional and State directors. Initially, the current
prevailing fees or reimbursement would be the basis for the fee negotiation
for all professional services covered under this Act.
(B) CONSIDERATIONS— In establishing such schedule, the Director
shall take into consideration regional differences in reimbursement,
but strive for a uniform national standard.
(C) STATE PHYSICIAN PRACTICE REVIEW BOARDS— The State director
for each State, in consultation with representatives of the physician
community of that State, shall establish and appoint a physician practice
review board to assure quality, cost effectiveness, and fair reimbursements
for physician delivered services.
(D) FINAL GUIDELINES— The regional directors shall be responsible
for promulgating final guidelines to all providers.
(E) BILLING- Under this Act physicians shall submit bills to the regional
director on a simple form, or via computer. Interest shall be paid
to providers whose bills are not paid within 30 days of submission.
(F) NO BALANCE BILLING— Licensed health care clinicians who
accept any payment from the USNHI Program may not bill any patient
for any covered service.
(G) UNIFORM COMPUTER ELECTRONIC BILLING SYSTEM- The Director shall
make a good faith effort to create a uniform computerized electronic
billing system, including in those areas of the United States where
electronic billing is not yet established.
(3) SALARIES WITHIN
INSTITUTIONS RECEIVING GLOBAL BUDGETS—
(A) IN GENERAL—
In the case of an institution, such as a hospital, health center,
group practice, community and migrant health center, or a home care
agency that elects to be paid a monthly global budget for the delivery
of health care as well as for education and prevention programs, physicians
employed by such institutions shall be reimbursed through a salary
included as part of such a budget.
(B) SALARY RANGES— Salary ranges for health care providers shall
be determined in the same way as fee schedules under paragraph (2).
(4) SALARIES WITHIN
CAPITATED GROUPS—
(A) IN GENERAL—
Health maintenance organizations, group practices, and other institutions
may elect to be paid capitation premiums to cover all outpatient,
physician, and medical home care provided to individuals enrolled
to receive benefits through the organization or entity.
(B) SCOPE- Such capitation may include the costs of services of licensed
physicians and other licensed, independent practitioners provided
to inpatients. Other costs of inpatient and institutional care shall
be excluded from capitation payments, and shall be covered under institutions'
global budgets.
(C) PROHIBITION OF SELECTIVE ENROLLMENT— Selective enrollment
policies are prohibited, and patients shall be permitted to enroll
or disenroll from such organizations or entities with appropriate
notice.
(D) HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS— Under this Act—
(i) health
maintenance organizations shall be required to reimburse physicians
based on a salary; and
(ii) financial incentives between such organizations and physicians
based on utilization are prohibited.
HSA:
(a) Establishing
Global Budgets; Monthly Sum:
(1) Each facility
will bill via a fee for service system determined by the same Medicare
system we use now or would adapt to this. This is a simple uncomplicated
way to accomplish this.
(2) There will
be no global budget for an institution or other providers covered on
this plan. It will up to citizens to determine if Nursing homes and
facilities other than hospitals, health providers and drugs are covered.
If they do cover it will be under fee for service method. (The caveat
still holds that citizens will most likely declare educational some
large clinics and hospitals and fund them in whatever way is appropriate—and
probably much more than with just fee for service payments due to the
nature of the educational activity.)
(b) (A) Fee for
service will be the only method of payment.
(B) and (C) will not have salaries attached to them. If a group wishes
to have salaried providers they will take these monies out of fee for
service of other associated providers. (Remember one of the vital rules
of HSA; there will be no non-compete contracts such that I think a group
of physicians, as an example, wanting to give someone a salary out of
their fee for service payment will be few. ( In general administration
will not be able to create very many provider-salaried positions, since
the people contributing to this with their own fees would not stay in
such a situation and would move on) This same idea will reduce administration
to only needful situations. There will be no capitated health maintenance
organizations. Non-profit is somewhat of a misnomer in that administrative
salaries are taken before profit is declared so being non-profit does
not necessarily control high salaries and waste.
(2) Fee for service:
(A) All fees
will be negotiated under the same method Medicare uses at this time.
All appeal processes will remain the same until citizens would choose
to change.
(B) All current
Medicare considerations will be used as now. (This office of Medicare
will be incorporated into HSA)
(C) HSA agrees
with practice review boards, but would add the county medical society
peer review groups as well as the state society peer review groups.
This will give an added layer of quality protection.
(D) Final guidelines
will come out of the Board of Information but will start with current
Medicare rules and regulations until changed by the HSA governance
process.
(E) Billing
is to be on 14-day cycle. It is electronic and there is no need to
extend it.
(F) Agreed—no
balance billing of patients allowed.
(G) Medicare
electronic billing methods will be adapted—and if they are non-uniform,
HSA will recommend WPS methods in Wisconsin and Illinois.
(3) Salaries within
institutions receiving global budget:
(A) Providers
within this system will be paid on fee for service as in any other
atmosphere of health delivery. This allows the focus on exactly what
is being done with the provider’s time. This will keep costs
in line and reduce waste. Accountability must be maintained and salaries
do not allow this to work as effectively.
(B) Salary ranges:
There will be a fee for service and this will be determined as Medicare
now does with, of course, the oversight of citizens through the governing
mechanism.
(4) Salaries within
capitated groups:
(A) In HSA there
will be no capitated groups. There will be fee for service done. If
there are five services done there will be money coming for five services
at the specific fee schedule set. This is the only way administration
costs can be gotten under control.
(B) Scope: See
(A) above
(C) Prohibition
of selective enrollment is not allowed in HSA.
(D) Health maintenance
organizations will be permissible, but will be based on fee for service.
It is doubtful that this form of practice will survive with the 8
rules of HSA becoming the law. The removal of non-compete clauses
will probably be the end of this failed group system of practice.
Sec.
203. Payment for Long-Term Care
HR 676:
a) Allotment for
Regions— The Program shall provide for each region a single budgetary
allotment to cover a full array of long-term care services under this
Act.
(b) Regional Budgets— Each region shall provide a global budget
to local long-term care providers for the full range of needed services,
including in-home, nursing home, and community based care.
(c) Basis for Budgets— Budgets for long-term care services under
this section shall be based on past expenditures, financial and clinical
performance, utilization, and projected changes in service, wages, and
other related factors.
(d) Favoring Non-Institutional Care— All efforts shall be made under
this Act to provide long-term care in a home- or community-based setting,
as opposed to institutional care.
HSA:
HSA does not include
long-term care at this stage. It is felt that medical, surgical, hospital
and drug coverage are the first things that need to be dealt with. The
mechanisms used in the governance of HSA will allow for long-term care
on what ever basis citizens would wish to include it.
Sec.204.
Mental Health Services
HR 676:
(a) In General—
The program shall provide coverage for all medically necessary mental
health care on the same basis as the coverage for other conditions. Licensed
mental health clinicians shall be paid in the same manner as specified
for other health professionals, as provided for in section 202(b).
(b) Favoring Community-Based Care— The USNHI Program shall cover
supportive residences, occupational therapy, and ongoing mental health
and counseling services outside the hospital for patients with serious
mental illness. In all cases the highest quality and most effective care
shall be delivered, and, for some individuals, this may mean institutional
care.
HSA:
(a) HSA shall provide
coverage for all medically necessary mental health care on the same basis
as the coverage for other conditions. Licensed mental health clinicians
shall be paid in the same manner as specified for other health professionals
in HSA
Sec.205
Payment for Prescription Medications, Medical Supplies, and Medically
Necessary Assistive Equipment
HR 676:
a) Negotiated Prices—
The prices to be paid each year under this Act for covered pharmaceuticals,
medical supplies, and medically necessary assistive equipment shall be
negotiated annually by the Program.
(b) Prescription
Drug Formulary—
(1) IN GENERAL—
The Program shall establish a prescription drug formulary system, which
shall encourage best-practices in prescribing and discourage the use
of ineffective, dangerous, or excessively costly medications when better
alternatives are available.
(2) PROMOTION OF USE OF GENERICS— The formulary shall promote
the use of generic medications but allow the use of brand-name and off-formulary
medications when indicated for a specific patient or condition.
(3) FORMULARY UPDATES AND PETITION RIGHTS— The formulary shall
be updated frequently and clinicians and patients may petition their
region or the Director to add new pharmaceuticals or to remove ineffective
or dangerous medications from the formulary.
HSA:
(a) Negotiated prices: same as HR 676
(b) Prescription drug formulary: same as HR 676, but the provisions for
updates and petition rights in 205 (b. 3) will be open to same citizen
governance as all other topics in the HSA health plan.
Sec.206. Consultation in Establishing Reimbursement
Levels
HR 676:
Reimbursement levels
under this subtitle shall be set after close consultation with regional
and State Directors and after the annual meeting of National Board of
Universal Quality and Access.
HSA:
The method of determining
reimbursement will be the same as now done with Medicare and will use
its appeal processes and rule making mechanisms. (These current Medicare
offices will be incorporated into the HSA governing process)
Subtitle B —
Funding
Sec.211.
Overview: Funding The USNHI Program
HR 676:
(a) In General-
The USNHI Program is to be funded as provided in subsections (b) and (c).
(b) Annual Appropriation for Funding of USNHI Program- There are authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this Act such sums as may be necessary.
(c) Intent- Sums appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) shall be paid
for—
(1) by vastly
reducing paperwork;
(2) by requiring a rational bulk procurement of medications;
(3) from existing sources of Federal government revenues for health
care;
(4) by increasing personal income taxes on the top 5 percent income
earners;
(5) by instituting a modest payroll tax; and
(6) by instituting a small tax on stock and bond transactions.
HSA:
(a) HSA is funded
by premiums paid by citizens that have determined the coverage and premium.
There is no money coming from taxes other than that which the government
pays the premium for the poor.
(b) Premiums will calculated annually
(c) Intent:
(1) Premiums will
be in the range of 50% less due to reduced paperwork, patients more
attuned to their own personal health responsibility, control of waste,
influence and by implementation of the 8 eight rules in HSA
(2) Premiums will be reduced partially due to bulk medicine negotiations
and
(3) Revenues currently
forwarded for poor and their health bills will also be used in HSA rather
the Medicaid or other actual plans.
(4, 5, 6) The
taxes referred to in (4), (5) and (6) will not be a part of HSA
Sec.212. Appropriations for Existing Programs for the
uninsured
HR 676:
Notwithstanding
any other provision of law, there are hereby transferred and appropriated
to carry out this Act, amounts equivalent to the amounts the Secretary
estimates would have been appropriated and expended for Federal public
health care programs for the uninsured and indigent, including funds appropriated
under the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act,
under the Medicaid program under title XIX of such Act, and under the
Children's Health Insurance Program under title XXI of such Act.
HSA:
The funds in this
section referred to in the last paragraph will be used for paying premiums
for the indigent as identified by the government in their Congressional
deliberations.
Title 111 — Administration
Sec.301. Public Administration; Appointment of Director
HR 676:
(a) In General—
Except as otherwise specifically provided, this Act shall be administered
by the Secretary through a Director appointed by the Secretary.
(b) Long-Term Care— The Director shall appoint a director for long-term
care who shall be responsible for administration of this Act and ensuring
the availability and accessibility of high quality long-term care services.
(c) Mental Health— The Director shall appoint a director for mental
health who shall be responsible for administration of this Act and ensuring
the availability and accessibility of high quality mental health services.
HSA:
(a) HSA (a non-profit
insurance company) will be administered through its citizen government
mechanisms described in detail in Health Security America: Fixing the
health care crisis. In essence, there will be no direct link to the Executive
Branch or Congress after HSA is up and running.
(b) and (c) Long-term
care and mental health services will be controlled through HSA’s
citizen government mechanisms as per (a) of this section should citizens
decide they want to include this in their own non-profit insurance company.
Sec.302.
Office of Quality Control
HR 676:
The Director shall
appoint a director for an Office of Quality Control. Such director shall,
after consultation with state and regional directors, provide annual recommendations
to Congress, the President, the Secretary, and other Program officials
on how to ensure the highest quality health care service delivery. The
director of the Office of Quality Control shall conduct an annual review
on the adequacy of medically necessary services, and shall make recommendations
of any proposed changes to the Congress, the President, the Secretary,
and other USNHI program officials.
HSA:
The same offices
addressing quality control in the Medicare program will transfer to HSA
In addition HSA will also have the county medical society peer review
mechanisms which have proven very effective in the past. Any questions
of quality control will be addressed by this office and any global issues
requiring citizen input will be given to the board of information of HSA
biannually for research and transferring to the HSA Regional Representatives
for the usual hearing process and action/decision process addressed in
the book Health Security America: Fixing the health care crisis.*
Sec.
303. Regional and State Administration; Employment of Displaced Clerical
Workers
HR 676:
(a) Use of Regional
Offices— The Program shall establish and maintain regional offices.
Such regional offices shall replace all regional Medicare offices.
(b) Appointment of Regional and State Directors- In each such regional
office there shall be—
(1) one regional
director appointed by the Director; and
(2) for each State in the region, a deputy director (in this Act referred
to as a `State Director') appointed by the governor of that State.
(c) Regional Office
Duties—
(1) IN GENERAL—
Regional offices of the Program shall be responsible for—
(A) coordinating
funding to health care providers and physicians; and
(B) coordinating billing and reimbursements with physicians and health
care providers through a State-based reimbursement system.
(d) State Director's
Duties- Each State Director shall be responsible for the following duties:
(1) Providing
an annual state health care needs assessment report to the National
Board of Universal Quality and Access, and the regional board, after
a thorough examination of health needs, in consultation with public
health officials, clinicians, patients and patient advocates.
(2) Health planning, including oversight of the placement of new hospitals,
clinics, and other health care delivery facilities.
(3) Health planning, including oversight of the purchase and placement
of new health equipment to ensure timely access to care and to avoid
duplication.
(4) Submitting global budgets to the regional director.
(5) Recommending changes in provider reimbursement or payment for delivery
of health services in the State.
(6) Establishing a quality assurance mechanism in the State in order
to minimize both under utilization and over utilization and to assure
that all providers meet high quality standards.
(7) Reviewing program disbursements on a quarterly basis and recommending
needed adjustments in fee schedules needed to achieve budgetary targets
and assure adequate access to needed care.
(e) First Priority
in Retraining and Job Placement— The Program shall provide that
clerical and administrative workers in insurance companies, doctors offices,
hospitals, nursing facilities and other facilities whose jobs are eliminated
due to reduced administration, should have first priority in retraining
and job placement in the new system.
HSA:
(a) Medicare infrastructure
will be available to HSA. This includes technical, actuarial, regulatory
and rule making offices with associated auditing facilities and any other
currently functioning offices that could aid HSA in its mission.
(b) All regional
directors are elected by citizens in publicly financed campaigns. Regional
Directors will elect the board of information and the remaining officers
of HSA. The specific mechanisms are spelled out in Health Security America:
Fixing the health care crisis* and will be part of the by-laws of HSA
enabled by Congressional legislation.
(c, d) Regional
office and state director’s duties: The duties are similar but the
difference is the non-profit corporation daily operation starts with the
same rules and regulation as the present Medicare system. The Board of
Information will offer any changes they think are necessary as time passes,
and these will ultimately be approved by the citizens in the governance
mechanism of HSA.
(e) First priority
in retraining and job placement: The program shall provide that clerical
and administrative workers in insurance companies, doctors’ offices,
hospitals, nursing facilities and other facilities where jobs are eliminated
due to reduced administration, should have first priority in retraining
and job placement in the non-profit insurance company, HSA
Sec.
304. Confidential Electronic Patient Record System
HR 676:
(a) In General—
The Secretary shall create a standardized, confidential electronic patient
record system in accordance with laws and regulations to maintain accurate
patient records and to simplify the billing process, thereby reducing
medical errors and bureaucracy.
(b) Patient Option— Notwithstanding that all billing shall be performed
electronically, patients shall have the option of keeping any portion
of their medical records separate from their electronic medical record.
HSA:
(a) In general:
The non-profit corporation, HSA, shall create a standardized, confidential
electronic patient record system in accordance with laws and regulations
to maintain accurate patient records and to simplify the billing process,
thereby reducing medical errors and bureaucracy.
(b) Patient option: Notwithstanding that all billing shall be performed
electronically, patients shall have the option of keeping any portion
of their medical records separate from their electronic medical record.
Sec.305 National Board of Universal Quality
and Access
HR 676:
(a) Establishment—
(1) IN GENERAL—There
is established a National Board of Universal Quality and Access (in
this section referred to as the `Board') consisting of 15 members appointed
by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(2) QUALIFICATIONS— The appointed members of the Board shall include
at least one of each of the following:
(A) Health care
professionals.
(B) Representatives of institutional providers of health care.
(C) Representatives of health care advocacy groups.
(D) Representatives of labor unions.
(E) Citizen patient advocates.
(3) TERMS—
Each member shall be appointed for a term of 6 years, except that the
President shall stagger the terms of members initially appointed so
that the term of no more than 3 members expires in any year.
(4) PROHIBITION ON CONFLICTS OF INTEREST— No member of the Board
shall have a financial conflict of interest with the duties before the
Board.
(b) Duties—
(1) IN GENERAL—
The Board shall meet at least twice per year and shall advise the Secretary
and the Director on a regular basis to ensure quality, access, and affordability.
(2) SPECIFIC ISSUES—The Board shall specifically address the following
issues:
(A) Access to
care.
(B) Quality improvement.
(C) Efficiency of administration.
(D) Adequacy of budget and funding.
(E) Appropriateness of reimbursement levels of physicians and other
providers.
(F) Capital expenditure needs.
(G) Long-term care.
(H) Mental health and substance abuse services.
(I) Staffing levels and working conditions in health care delivery
facilities.
(3) ESTABLISHMENT
OF UNIVERSAL, BEST QUALITY STANDARD OF CARE- The Board shall specifically
establish a universal, best quality of standard of care with respect
to—
(A) appropriate
staffing levels;
(B) appropriate medical technology;
(C) design and scope of work in the health workplace; and
(D) best practices.
(4) TWICE-A-YEAR
REPORT—The Board shall report its recommendations twice each year
to the Secretary, the Director, Congress, and the President.
(c) Compensation,
Etc— The following provisions of section 1805 of the Social Security
Act shall apply to the Board in the same manner as they apply to the Medicare
Payment Assessment Commission (except that any reference to the Commission
or the Comptroller General shall be treated as references to the Board
and the Secretary, respectively):
(1) Subsection
(c)(4) (relating to compensation of Board members).
(2) Subsection (c)(5) (relating to chairman and vice chairman)
(3) Subsection (c)(6) (relating to meetings).
(4) Subsection (d) (relating to director and staff; experts and consultants).
(5) Subsection (e) (relating to powers).
HSA:
HSA starts with
the existing Medicare rules, regulations and fees. The governing of the
individual provider offices will be done by the owners, and, in the case
of hospitals, the same with oversight by regional planning agencies.
State medical societies
with their complement of county societies have peer review committees
that work to assure quality. They will begin to function again.
There is no problem
with citizens deciding they want to pay for a new bureaucracy designated
“The National Board of Universal Quality and Access” It could
function just as HR 676 suggests, but this will be voted on by citizens.
The mechanism is described in the governance sections of Health Security
America: Fixing the health care crisis* Prior to the HMO, large-clinic
method of practice, there was no crisis in quality that demanded a national
bureaucracy.
Title
IV—Additional Provisions
Sec.
401. Treatment of VA and IHS Health Programs
HR 676:
This Act provides
for health programs of the Department of Veterans' Affairs and of the
Indian Health Service to initially remain independent for the 5-year period
that begins on the date of the establishment of the USNHI program, but
after such period those programs shall be integrated into the USNHI program.
HSA:
HSA starts with
the Medicare rules, fees and regulations and is a non-profit health insurance
company governed by citizens. Veterans are receiving care as the consequences
of Congressional actions that put them there—wars and other conflicts.
Actuarial findings will be impossible to determine for this insurance
company and determining premiums and coverage will be impossible. Unless
a fair way can be determined the VA system will have to remain independent.
The Indian Health
Service will be abandoned and included in the non-profit insurance company
immediately on being enabled by Congress and a process for transfer can
be done.
Sec.
402. Public Health and Prevention
HR 676:
It is the intent
of this Act that the Program at all times stress the importance of good
public health through the prevention of diseases.
HSA:
No difference.
Sec.403.
Reduction in Health Disparities
HR 676:
It is the intent
of this Act to reduce health disparities by race, ethnicity, income and
geographic region, and to provide high quality, cost-effective, culturally
appropriate care to all individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, sexual
orientation, or language.
HSA:
This is the total intent of HSA
Title V—Effective
Date
Sec.501.
Effective Date
HR 676:
Except as otherwise specifically provided, this Act shall take effect
on January 1, 2007, and shall apply to items and services furnished on
or after such date.
HSA:
To take effect on a date specified by Congress.
*Health Security
America: Fixing the health care crisis
Is available at www.healthsecurityamerica.com
Health
Security America is the remedy.
Contact: webmaster
©2008 by the Coalition for a Health-Secure America
Design
by Four Leaf Clover. |